I’ve been involved with a few projects lately managed by others. At the same time, my wife was volunteering for an elementary school project In all of these projects, the “managers” tried to run the projects through email.
_____
The intentions were all good — but that’s where the good ends. First came the introductory emails, then the reply-alls from, well everybody. At that point, it was fairly easy to ignore the chaff.
_____
Trouble came when the substantive emails started. Documents were attached for review. Responses were sent back to the project manager, with reply-alls to everyone else. With some 18 different professionals involved from the same number of states, well, you can do the math. None of the replies were relevant to me. The project manager replied to the replies with followup requests and with additional information. Replies and requests for clarification were sent back to the project manager. Replies and work product were also sent back to the project manager. All the while, the same subject line was used.
_____
This pattern continued and was repeated many times throughout the project. I spent HOURS, sifting through the communications to sort out which ones pertained to me, which were merely reply-alls, and which were requests for action. Oh, and by the way, I was getting paid hourly.
_____
I noticed the same pattern in my wife’s school project emails and my other recent project. Not only does this type of project management waste time, but it burns good will in a hurry, leads to missed assignments and is massively inefficient.










